The American mining industry will be the backdrop in three of the four states where the presidential candidates’ debate. In Virginia, Missouri and Nevada, the candidates will be surrounded by communities that rely heavily on mining for reliable, low-cost energy; high-paying jobs; and important state revenues. Those communities are on the front lines of many others that will be significantly impacted by the policies of the next administration.
Mineral Availability and Land Access
While the U.S. is rich in mineral resources, permit delays, regulatory uncertainty and land withdrawals hamper investment in our domestic resources, increasing our reliance on foreign imports. Pending EPA regulations threaten mineral miners with redundant financial assurance regulations that duplicate existing state and federal rules.
The next administration has an opportunity to advance policies that will support the responsible development of domestic minerals resources, with Nevada as a leading example of communities that would benefit greatly from such action.
Oct. 19, 2016, Third Presidential Debate, Las Vegas, Nev.
The third presidential debate will take place in less than one month. Because the debate is in Nevada, the candidates can expect their mining policy to be on the forefront of discussion. Nevada’s economy heavily relies on Mining.
Key to Nevada’s economy:
- Nevada’s ranks first in U.S. nonfuel mineral production valued at $6.9 billion in 2015.
- Nevada’s average annual mining wage of $93,000 is more than twice the state average wage of $44,500.
- Mining in Nevada supports 61,900 jobs total (including direct, indirect and induced).
- Nevada mining companies paid $1.9 billion in federal, state and local taxes (including direct, indirect and induced).
Key Questions for Our Next President
Given the importance of affordable and reliable electricity made possible through coal mining, and our economy’s reliance on minerals and metals to build infrastructure and sustain high-wage employment, the debates should probe into whether candidates’ positions address the realities faced by working Americans.
Key questions the candidates should be asked:
- In the past, both Democratic and Republican administrations have supported an “all of the above” energy policy, which advocates for the balanced use of all energy resources available, including coal, natural gas, nuclear and renewables. Seventy percent of voters have said the candidates’ position on energy policy will be important to their vote this fall, with another seven in 10 voters supporting an “all of the above” energy strategy (Morning Consult poll conducted for NMA, August 3-5, 2016). What is your position on the “keep it in the ground” movement being championed by environmental groups demanding that the world’s fossil fuels be kept in the ground?
- Is this movement realistic given our current energy grid (5 percent of electricity generated by wind and solar)? What would such a transformation of our energy grid cost on the front end from an infrastructure perspective and on the back end in terms of electricity costs to consumers, and where will these funds come from?
- Nevada is a mineral rich state, yet current policies tie up the mining industry in red tape, with multiple federal agencies typically taking seven to 10 years to approve a new mining project that could provide well-paying jobs for hundreds. Where should the balance be between environmental oversight and efficient regulatory responsibility?
Tags: Presidential Debate, Presidential Candidates, Mining, Industry, National Mining Association, Idaho Mining Association, Nevada Mining Association, Mining, Jobs, People, Miners